Jennifer さんのプロフィールthoughts born of boredomフォトブログリストその他 ツール ヘルプ
    1月17日

    Do you want to waste my time? Make a commercial

    When I was younger I was one of those people who loved commercials; the jingles, the new products, the corny dances ... what was there not to love about them?  They were like Shakespeares' buffoons, jesters and clowns: comedic relief during those long programs that all too often failed to make a point.  I am pained to admit that a number of years ago this love turned to despair.  Some may argue that I grew out of my love for commercials, that I was a young and naive child who was infatuated not with the commercial itself but with the change on the screen in front of me.  Others may argue that I was an undiagnosed ADHD sufferer and commercials provided a brief episode that my attention span could handle w/o becoming bored.  To these people I say let's not overanalyze the situation shall we.  In my opinion the shift in my perspective about commercials occurred when they started to get dumb.  I am not talking only about television commercials either, radio commercials may surpass those on television in their level of stupidity and their lack of subtlety. 

    Maybe I am being nostalgic for the days when products sold themselves and I didn't have to see half naked women being paraded across a screen, or dry-humping to get me to buy something but whatever happened to subtlety?  When did commercials become so dumb that I feel as if I am losing intelligence just by listening to and/or watching them?  When did advertisers decide that I am not intelligent enough to pick up on the subtle hints they give in a commercial, that I need them to beat me over the head with a point until I cannot see straight (or maybe that is the point, make people feel so dumb that they will buy the product b/c they know no better).  

    In early December I read something saying that instead of commercials advertisers are switching to a mini movie format to sell products.  This new format will be a 3 minute movie in which a product isn't sold, or really even mentioned, it will be the movie that acts as a draw for the product ... ("well I'm convinced folks, that's just about the dumbest thing I ever heard" [Nick, Jimmy Neutron Boy Genius]).  Nicole Kidman stars in the most expensive commercial ever made, for Chanel No. 5 that utilizes this format.  This "film" has also been cut down to a 30 second version that is being shown on cable.  The reason given behind this switch was that commercials have come as far as they can.  They were ingenious when they began but today's consumer no longer wants to have something sold to them, they want to become engrossed in a story and that will lead them to buy the product (this is clearly paraphrased but it is essentially what the article said).  But I ask is it so much that we do not want to be sold to or does the method of selling leave much to be desired?  Rather than spending millions of dollars on creating vast stories that are intended to get me so caught up in the storyline that I have to have a product why not try going back to an earlier commercial formula, one that treated the consumer as an intelligent member of society, so intelligent that they knew that it would be stupid of them not to have the product in question. 

    Well all I can say is thank goodness that flyers still possess that "je ne sais quoi" that keeps me waiting anxiously for their delivery every week or else I might be rallying to have all forms of advertising banned until executives decide to treat us like the intelligent people we are and not the mindless idiots they want us to be. 

    コメント (1 件)

    しばらくお待ちください。
    入力されたコメントは長すぎます。短くしてください。
    何も入力されていません。もう一度やり直してください。
    現在、コメントを追加できません。後でもう一度やり直してください。
    コメントと書くには、保護者 (ほごしゃ) の方の許可 (きょか) をもらってください。許可をリクエストする
    保護者 (ほごしゃ) の方が、あなたがコメントを書けないようにしています。
    現在、コメントを削除できません。後でもう一度やり直してください。
    1 日に投稿できるコメントの最大数を超えました。24 時間経過してから、もう一度やり直してください。
    あなたが他のユーザーに対して迷惑行為を行っている可能性があると確認されたため、お使いのアカウントによるコメントの投稿を無効にしています。誤って無効にされたと思われる場合は、Windows Live のサポートにお問い合わせください。
    コメントを投稿する前に、以下のセキュリティ チェックを完了してください。
    セキュリティ チェックに入力する文字は、画像に表示されている文字または音声で流れた文字と一致していなければいけません。

    コメントを投稿するには、お使いの Windows Live ID でサインインしてください (Hotmail、Messenger、または Xbox LIVE を既に使用している場合は、そのアカウントが Windows Live ID です)。サインイン


    Windows Live ID をお持ちでない場合は、アカウントを新規登録してください。

    匿名 の表示アイコン
    RyanWoolfrey さんの投稿:
    Interesting thoughts. I agree - advertising has gone downhill. Products take a backseat to flashy images and style.

    Personally, I think this assaulting advertising age is starting to (slooowly) come to an "end". Industries seem to be moving toward more "consumer-driven" interfaces; if you need an example, look at Google. It is one of the hottest companies out there right now, and their advertising is different. It isn't assaulting, it is actually relevant and informative. Advertisers still make their money, but the advertisements that consumers see are ads that are (usually) of interest to them. Is this the future of tv? Ads during TV shows that appear at the bottom of the screen that deal directly with the show's content?
    1 月 18 日

    トラックバック

    この記事のトラックバックの URL は次のとおりです。
    http://saintlyhellion.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!BED2319A10D150B9!248.trak
    この記事を参照しているブログ
    • なし